Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-21

B.Y.NARASIMHA PRASAD vs M.VEERAPPA

Citation / case number
SC 2006/19832
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.Y.NARASIMHA PRASAD
Respondent
M.VEERAPPA
Author
AFTAB ALAM
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,AFTAB ALAM, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court affirming the trial court's dismissal of the eviction petition under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, citing Section 2(3)(f) which states that premises undergoing substantial renovation are exempt from eviction proceedings for 15 years. The Court found that the substantial renovation occurred in 1988, and the eviction petition filed in 1999 was thus not maintainable. The Court held that the tenant's rights were protected under the Act due to the timing of the renovation and the filing of the eviction petition.

B.Y.NARASIMHA PRASAD vs M.VEERAPPA · Niyam