Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-16

H.U.D.A. vs RAJ SINGH RANA

Citation / case number
SC 2005/8543
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H.U.D.A.
Respondent
RAJ SINGH RANA
Author
Altamas Kabir
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR,MARKANDEY KATJU, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the allotment of residential plot No. 718 under the Punjab Urban Estate (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964, which was later repealed by the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1997. The Court held that the respondent, Shri Raj Singh Rana, had fulfilled all payment obligations as per the allotment conditions, and thus, his rights to the plot were protected under the repealed Act. The Court emphasized that the provisions of the repealed Act continue to govern the allotment and payment conditions, affirming the respondent's entitlement to the plot.

H.U.D.A. vs RAJ SINGH RANA · Niyam