Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-10

SUJIT KUMAR BANERJEE vs M/S RAMESHWARAN .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/23849
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUJIT KUMAR BANERJEE
Respondent
M/S RAMESHWARAN .
Author
R.V.RAVEENDRAN
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the appellant qualifies as a consumer, as the agreement with the builder is for construction and delivery of a residential building, not a joint venture. The Court distinguished this case from Faqir Chand Gulati v. M/s. Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd., where the appellant was deemed not a consumer. The Court set aside the National Commission's order and remitted the matter for fresh disposal on merits.

SUJIT KUMAR BANERJEE vs M/S RAMESHWARAN . · Niyam