SIDDHARTH CONSTURCTION vs D.T.VORA .

The Supreme Court held that the Commission should not have entertained the complaints due to the intricate questions of fact involved, which are better suited for resolution by a civil court. The Court emphasized the need for a detailed evaluation of pleadings and evidence, and remitted the matter back to the Commission for fresh adjudication, allowing parties to present oral and documentary evidence. The Court directed the Commission to resolve the petitions within one year, considering the twelve-year delay since the complaints were filed.