Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-07

M/S. ASIAN PEROXIDES LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR

Citation / case number
SC 2004/13814
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. ASIAN PEROXIDES LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,P. SATHASIVAM,AFTAB ALAM, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the eligibility of the appellant for exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE dated 1.3.1997 concerning Hydrogen Peroxide manufactured in a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU). The Court upheld the CESTAT's decision that the materials used were raw materials and not consumables, thereby denying the exemption. The ruling clarified the definitions of 'raw material' and 'consumable' as per the EXIM Policy, emphasizing that items essential for the end product's manufacture qualify as raw materials under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

M/S. ASIAN PEROXIDES LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR · Niyam