Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-14

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV. AUTHORITY vs BHUPINDER SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 2002/279
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV. AUTHORITY
Respondent
BHUPINDER SINGH
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from a common order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission regarding the allotment of houses by the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (PUDA). The Court held that the earnest money deposited by applicants did not create a vested right to allotment, as explicitly stated in the application process. The Court affirmed the legality of PUDA's actions under the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995, and clarified that the refund of earnest money was permissible for unsuccessful applicants who requested it.

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV. AUTHORITY vs BHUPINDER SINGH · Niyam