Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-10

Collector, Hooghly & Ors vs Nirmal Sarkar (D) By Lrs. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2008 SC 28
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Collector, Hooghly & Ors
Respondent
Nirmal Sarkar (D) By Lrs. & Ors
Bench
G.S. Singhvi, B.N. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Calcutta High Court erred in refusing to condone the delay in filing a review application and an appeal, which was dismissed on the grounds of limitation. The Court found that the High Court's earlier dismissal lacked justification, as it did not consider the merits of the case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned orders were set aside, and the delay was condoned, restoring the appeal for a hearing on merits as per law.

Collector, Hooghly & Ors vs Nirmal Sarkar (D) By Lrs. & Ors · Niyam