Anil Mishra vs Union Of India & Ors

The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing Anil Mishra's challenge against an adverse entry in his service record, citing the lack of evidence for malafide intent and the thorough consideration of his representations by senior authorities. The Court emphasized that the scope of judicial review over administrative orders is limited, referencing Tata Cellular vs. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 11. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal's and the Chief Commissioner's decisions, affirming that the appellant failed to raise new arguments during the proceedings.