Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-16

H.U.D.A vs Raj Singh Rana

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 3035
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H.U.D.A
Respondent
Raj Singh Rana
Author
Altamas Kabir
Bench
Markandey Katju, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under the Punjab Urban Estate (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964, the allotment of residential plot No. 718 to Shri Raj Singh Rana was valid as the entire tentative sale price was paid, including any enhancements due to compensation. The Court emphasized that the conditions of allotment, particularly regarding payment timelines and penalties for delay, were binding and must be adhered to. The judgment upheld the respondent's rights to the plot, affirming the legality of the allotment process under the relevant statutory provisions.

H.U.D.A vs Raj Singh Rana · Niyam