Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-07-30

Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd vs Computer Joint India Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SC (SUPP) 591
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd
Respondent
Computer Joint India Ltd
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, a court has the discretion to summon or re-examine witnesses if their evidence is essential for a just decision of the case. The Court emphasized that the mandatory language in the second part of Section 311 compels the court to act if new evidence appears essential, thereby ensuring that justice is not compromised due to procedural oversights. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to reject the application for re-examination of witnesses.

Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd vs Computer Joint India Ltd · Niyam