C.Senthilvel vs E.S.Natarajan & Ors

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with the Trial Court's order appointing the appellant as a Member of the AVC Education Committee, as there was no error apparent on the face of the record nor was the Trial Court's finding perverse. The Court emphasized that the High Court's re-appreciation of facts was not permissible in writ jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, restoring the Trial Court's order and setting aside the High Court's decision.