Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-01-11

FOOD CORPN. OF INDIA vs M/S. SEIL LTD. .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/7571
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
FOOD CORPN. OF INDIA
Respondent
M/S. SEIL LTD. .
Author
M. PANCHAL S.B. SINHA
Bench
J.M. PANCHAL S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 3(2)(f) and Section 3(3C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, the Central Government has the authority to direct manufacturers to supply levy sugar at a price fixed annually. The Court ruled that the appellant's withholding of payment for sugar supplied was unjustified as there were no complaints from the Central Government regarding quality or weight. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to direct payment for supplies made to the Central Government while relegating other claims to civil suit remedies, thereby upholding the principle that contractual disputes should not be resolved through writ petitions.

FOOD CORPN. OF INDIA vs M/S. SEIL LTD. . · Niyam