Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-01-24

BALASAHEB DAYANDEO NAIK vs APPASAHEB DATTATRAYA PAWAR

Citation / case number
SC 2005/9175
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BALASAHEB DAYANDEO NAIK
Respondent
APPASAHEB DATTATRAYA PAWAR
Author
P. SATHASIVAM ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reversed the Bombay High Court's decision that set aside the trial court's decree for specific performance of a contract under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Court held that the plaintiffs had demonstrated readiness and willingness to perform their part of the contract, and the defendant's claim that time was of the essence was not substantiated. The Court reinstated the trial court's decree for specific performance, emphasizing the importance of upholding contractual obligations.

BALASAHEB DAYANDEO NAIK vs APPASAHEB DATTATRAYA PAWAR · Niyam