Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-01-18

PREMKUMARI vs PRAHLAD DEV .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/2321
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PREMKUMARI
Respondent
PRAHLAD DEV .
Author
P. SATHASIVAM ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Sections 166A and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurer cannot be held liable for compensation if the driver of the vehicle does not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to enhance the compensation amount to Rs. 3,50,000 while exonerating the insurance company from liability due to the driver's lack of a valid licence. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the findings of the lower courts regarding the driver's negligence and the insurance company's non-liability.

PREMKUMARI vs PRAHLAD DEV . · Niyam