Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-01-23

VISHNU DEV SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/13274
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VISHNU DEV SHARMA
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Allahabad High Court's summary dismissal of a writ petition challenging a seniority list was indefensible due to the lack of reasons provided for the decision. The Court emphasized that the High Court is obligated to record reasons for its orders, as established in State of Orissa v. Dhaniram Luhar (2004 (5) SCC 568), which is essential for ensuring transparency and justice. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and directed it to reconsider the matter with adequate reasoning.

VISHNU DEV SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam