Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-01-23

BHEL WORKERS UNION vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2004/1196
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHEL WORKERS UNION
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Bench
ASHOK BHAN & DALVEER BHANDARI & P.SATHASIVAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of Rule 3 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, as amended by the Income Tax (Twenty-second) Amendment Rules, 2001, which pertains to the computation of perquisites under Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the previous judgment in Arun Kumar & Others vs. Union of India did not strike down Rule 3 but read it down to align with Section 17(2)(ii) of the Act. The appeals were disposed of in accordance with this precedent, noting a subsequent legislative amendment that added an 'Explanation 1' to Section 17(2) effective from 1.4.2002, which the Court did not challenge as it was not before them.

BHEL WORKERS UNION vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam