Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-01-17

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs UTTAM VISHNU PAWAR

Citation / case number
SC 2001/15058
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
UTTAM VISHNU PAWAR
Author
A.K. MATHUR,HARJIT SINGH BEDI, , ,
Bench
A.K. MATHUR,HARJIT SINGH BEDI, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the services rendered by an employee in a previous department must be counted for the purpose of Time Bound Promotion under the Government Resolution dated 8.6.1995, even if the employee is transferred to another zone and placed at zero seniority. The Court affirmed the decisions of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal and the Bombay High Court, which allowed the respondent's claim for counting past service. The ruling established that transfer does not negate the recognition of prior service for promotion eligibility under the specified resolution.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs UTTAM VISHNU PAWAR · Niyam