Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-01-25

B.P. Agarwal & Anr vs Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 1431
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.P. Agarwal & Anr
Respondent
Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Kerala High Court's order directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 5,00,000 under Order XLI Rule 1(3) of the CPC was improper, as there was no application for stay filed. The Court clarified that while non-compliance with a deposit order could lead to dismissal of a stay application, it could not result in the dismissal of the appeal itself. The judgment emphasized that the imposition of a deposit condition for admission of an appeal is not supported by Section 96 CPC and Order 41 Rule 11 CPC, which focus on the merits of the case.

B.P. Agarwal & Anr vs Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. & Ors · Niyam