Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-22

ANAND MALLICK vs STATE OF BIHAR

Citation / case number
SC 2006/31418
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANAND MALLICK
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR
Bench
CJI K.G. BALAKRISHNAN & R.V. RAVEENDRAN & MARKANDEY KATJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the complaint against the appellant did not establish offences under Sections 406 and 504 of IPC, as the necessary ingredients were absent. However, the Court found sufficient averments for the offence under Section 420 IPC, allowing the complainant to proceed with that charge. Consequently, the order taking cognizance for Sections 406 and 504 IPC was set aside, while the complaint under Section 420 IPC was permitted to continue.

ANAND MALLICK vs STATE OF BIHAR · Niyam