Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-05

V.J. THOMAS vs PATHROSE ABRAHAM .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/18736
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V.J. THOMAS
Respondent
PATHROSE ABRAHAM .
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether third parties can be impleaded in a suit under Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that the execution of an ex-parte decree can be contested by parties not originally included in the suit, provided they seek to be added as defendants and meet the necessary procedural requirements. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to allow the impleadment of respondents as defendants, emphasizing the importance of ensuring all relevant parties are included in property disputes.

V.J. THOMAS vs PATHROSE ABRAHAM . · Niyam