Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-27

Akhilesh Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. Th. Dgc (Crl.) & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 1680
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Akhilesh Kumar Singh
Respondent
State Of U.P. Th. Dgc (Crl.) & Anr
Author
K.G. Balakrishnan
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, R.V. Raveendran, D.K. Jain

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the cancellation of bail granted to the appellant under Sections 302 and 395 read with Section 120-B IPC. The Court held that the High Court's cancellation was based on the lack of change in circumstances since the first bail application was rejected. The Supreme Court directed the Sessions Judge to complete the trial within three months, allowing the appellant to seek bail if the trial is delayed, emphasizing that the decision should be made on merits without influence from the High Court's observations.

Akhilesh Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. Th. Dgc (Crl.) & Anr · Niyam