Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-05

Shri V.J. Thomas vs Shri Pathrose Abraham & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 1503
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shri V.J. Thomas
Respondent
Shri Pathrose Abraham & Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether a third party can be impleaded in a suit filed under Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that the Executing Court's decision to allow the impleadment of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as additional defendants was valid, despite the appellant's contention that they could not represent the panchayat and that the applications for condonation of delay were filed too late. The Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the revision application, thereby upholding the lower court's order.

Shri V.J. Thomas vs Shri Pathrose Abraham & Ors · Niyam