Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-12

Basic Education Board, U.P vs Upendra Rai And Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SC (SUPP) 1321
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Basic Education Board, U.P
Respondent
Upendra Rai And Others
Author
Markandey Katju
Bench
H. K. Sema, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the qualifications for appointment as Assistant Master in Junior Basic Schools in U.P. are governed by Rule 8 of the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, which requires both an Intermediate Certificate and a recognized training qualification. The Court found that the respondent, Upendra Rai, only possessed a Diploma in Education (D.Ed.), which was not recognized as equivalent to the required training qualifications after the U.P. Government Circular dated 11.8.1997 rescinded its prior equivalence. Consequently, the Court upheld the Division Bench's decision to set aside the earlier judgment and the Government Circular, affirming that the respondent was not eligible for appointment.

Basic Education Board, U.P vs Upendra Rai And Others · Niyam