Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-18
Laxman vs State Of M.P. & Anr
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- Laxman
- Respondent
- State Of M.P. & Anr
- Bench
- K.G. Balakrishnan, R.V. Raveendran
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court held that the conviction under Section 354 IPC for outraging modesty was sustainable, while the charge under Section 3(1)(11) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was not, as the prosecutrix was not a member of a Scheduled Caste. The Court modified the sentence from six months rigorous imprisonment to the period already undergone, increasing the fine from Rs.300 to Rs.10,000, which must be paid to the prosecutrix. The judgment emphasizes the importance of verifying caste status in cases under the Atrocities Act.