Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-18

Laxman vs State Of M.P. & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Laxman
Respondent
State Of M.P. & Anr
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the conviction under Section 354 IPC for outraging modesty was sustainable, while the charge under Section 3(1)(11) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was not, as the prosecutrix was not a member of a Scheduled Caste. The Court modified the sentence from six months rigorous imprisonment to the period already undergone, increasing the fine from Rs.300 to Rs.10,000, which must be paid to the prosecutrix. The judgment emphasizes the importance of verifying caste status in cases under the Atrocities Act.

Laxman vs State Of M.P. & Anr · Niyam