Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-18

Bimal Bandyopadhyay vs Md. Halim Sk

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bimal Bandyopadhyay
Respondent
Md. Halim Sk
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by directing the reconsideration of the respondent's case in contempt proceedings, as the proper recourse would have been to challenge the original order dated 1.3.2002 separately. The Court found that the Tribunal's order and the subsequent High Court ruling were unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed and both lower orders being set aside. The respondent retains the liberty to challenge the original order in accordance with law.

Bimal Bandyopadhyay vs Md. Halim Sk · Niyam