Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-02-22

Anand Mallick vs State Of Bihar & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Anand Mallick
Respondent
State Of Bihar & Anr
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, R.V. Raveendran, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the complaint against the appellant did not establish offences under Sections 406 and 504 of IPC, as the necessary ingredients were absent. Consequently, the Court set aside the order taking cognizance for these sections. However, the complaint under Section 420 IPC was upheld, allowing the complainant to proceed with that charge, affirming the legal principle that a complaint must contain specific averments to constitute an offence.

Anand Mallick vs State Of Bihar & Anr · Niyam