Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-12-12

B.P.MOIDEEN SEVAMANDIR vs A.M.KUTTY HASSAN

Citation / case number
SC 2008/34001
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.P.MOIDEEN SEVAMANDIR
Respondent
A.M.KUTTY HASSAN
Author
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,D.K. JAIN, , ,
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,D.K. JAIN, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized that Lok Adalats, as per the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, serve purely conciliatory functions and lack adjudicatory powers. The Court held that dismissing an appeal for default due to the absence of counsel, despite prior settlement efforts at the Lok Adalat, was inappropriate. The Court set aside the High Court's orders dated 19.8.2008 and 29.8.2008, reinforcing the need for adherence to the conciliatory nature of Lok Adalats in dispute resolution.

B.P.MOIDEEN SEVAMANDIR vs A.M.KUTTY HASSAN · Niyam