Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-12-05

MADHAV @ MAHADEV vs SINDHU PATIL

Citation / case number
SC 2008/31585
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MADHAV @ MAHADEV
Respondent
SINDHU PATIL
Author
B.N. AGRAWAL,G.S. SINGHVI, , ,
Bench
B.N. AGRAWAL,G.S. SINGHVI, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that in an appeal against a decree, the First Appellate Court must consider both oral and documentary evidence presented by the parties. The failure to do so renders the impugned order liable to be set aside. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court for a proper hearing in accordance with law.

MADHAV @ MAHADEV vs SINDHU PATIL · Niyam