Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-12-11

MAHARSHTRA STATE JUDGES ASSOCIATION&ORS. vs H.C. OF JUDI. AT BOMBAY THRU.R.G.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/10890
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAHARSHTRA STATE JUDGES ASSOCIATION&ORS.
Respondent
H.C. OF JUDI. AT BOMBAY THRU.R.G.
Author
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN
Bench
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN,R.V. RAVEENDRAN,J.M. PANCHAL, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a writ petition under Article 32, directed the Maharashtra government to create a uniform single cadre of District Judges by merging various judicial posts, emphasizing the need for inter-se seniority based on the date of entry into service. The Court held that the Maharashtra Judicial Service (Seniority) Rules 2007 were inconsistent with the principles established in earlier judgments, particularly the All India Judges’ Association cases, and thus required withdrawal or amendment. The Court reaffirmed the necessity for uniformity in the designation and hierarchy of judicial officers as mandated in previous rulings.

MAHARSHTRA STATE JUDGES ASSOCIATION&ORS. vs H.C. OF JUDI. AT BOMBAY THRU.R.G. · Niyam