Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-12-18

M/S. P. MANOHAR REDDY & BROS. vs MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEV.CORP.&ORS

Citation / case number
SC 2005/231
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. P. MANOHAR REDDY & BROS.
Respondent
MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEV.CORP.&ORS
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. SINHA,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the contractual obligations under the agreement between the parties, specifically focusing on clauses related to dispute resolution and arbitration as per the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940. The Court held that the contractor must follow the prescribed procedure for raising disputes and that failure to do so would render the Executive Engineer's decisions final. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the contractual terms for arbitration, thereby reinforcing the binding nature of arbitration clauses in contracts.

M/S. P. MANOHAR REDDY & BROS. vs MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEV.CORP.&ORS · Niyam