Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-12-16

Wada Arun Asbestos (P) Ltd vs Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 1027
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Wada Arun Asbestos (P) Ltd
Respondent
Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
Cyriac Joseph, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Order 37 Rule 3(6)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, a conditional leave to defend is deemed refused if the defendant fails to comply with the deposit condition. The High Court's decision to set aside the decree and remit the matter for trial was upheld, emphasizing that the defendant's non-compliance should not preclude a fair hearing on the merits of the case. The Court affirmed the importance of balancing procedural requirements with the principles of justice, allowing the defendant an opportunity to present their case.

Wada Arun Asbestos (P) Ltd vs Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board · Niyam