Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-12-01

Anusuyaben Sadashiv Jadav And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Anusuyaben Sadashiv Jadav And Anr
Respondent
Union Of India And Ors
Author
Chief Justice
Bench
Dalveer Bhandari, R.V. Raveendran, K.G. Balakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 2(3) and (5) of the Repealing Act, affirming that the judgments declaring these sections constitutional are valid. The Court set aside previous judgments requiring adherence to Section 321 of the Code for withdrawal of cases despite deemed withdrawal under POTA. The appeals of POTA accused were partially allowed, and the Court directed that cases be transferred to Sessions Judges for trial, emphasizing that bail applications must be reconsidered in light of the Review Committee's opinions.

Anusuyaben Sadashiv Jadav And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors · Niyam