Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-08-21

MONOTOSH SAHA vs SPL.DIRECTOR,ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE&ANR

Citation / case number
SC 2007/2389
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MONOTOSH SAHA
Respondent
SPL.DIRECTOR,ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE&ANR
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, affirming the Tribunal's order requiring a 60% pre-deposit of the penalty imposed under Section 50 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Court reiterated that discretion in granting stay pending disposal must be exercised judiciously, referencing principles from Silliguri Municipality v. Amalendu Das and others (AIR 1984 SC 653) and others. The Court found that the appellant did not establish a case for hardship warranting a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement.

MONOTOSH SAHA vs SPL.DIRECTOR,ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE&ANR · Niyam