Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-08-13

GRID CROPRATION OF ORISSA LTD. vs GAJENDRA HALDEA .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/32615
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GRID CROPRATION OF ORISSA LTD.
Respondent
GAJENDRA HALDEA .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,P. SATHASIVAM, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003, determining that the appeal filed by Gajendra Haldea was misconceived as it did not meet the statutory requirements for maintainability. The Court held that the Appellate Tribunal's order granting relief to Haldea was invalid, emphasizing the necessity for compliance with procedural mandates outlined in the Act. Consequently, the Court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's decision, reaffirming the jurisdictional boundaries established by the Electricity Act.

GRID CROPRATION OF ORISSA LTD. vs GAJENDRA HALDEA . · Niyam