Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-08-28

STATE OF H.P. vs SURESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU

Citation / case number
SC 2002/63215
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF H.P.
Respondent
SURESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT,P. SATHASIVAM,AFTAB ALAM, ,
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,P. SATHASIVAM,AFTAB ALAM, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Himachal Pradesh High Court acquitted the accused of charges under Sections 363, 366, and 376 IPC, finding insufficient evidence to support the conviction. The Court emphasized the need for corroborative evidence in sexual assault cases and noted that the prosecution failed to establish the elements of coercion and lack of consent. The judgment highlighted the importance of credible testimony and the burden of proof resting on the prosecution, ultimately leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision.

STATE OF H.P. vs SURESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU · Niyam