Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-08-04

Dinesh Singh vs State Of U.P

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 711
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dinesh Singh
Respondent
State Of U.P
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC, despite the acquittal of co-accused under Sections 147, 148, 302, 325, 323, and 149 IPC. The Court clarified that the right of private defence, as per Section 96 IPC, must be assessed based on the specific facts of each case, and the burden of proof lies with the accused under Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act. The Court found that the appellant failed to establish a legitimate exercise of this right, leading to the affirmation of the High Court's decision.

Dinesh Singh vs State Of U.P · Niyam