Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-08-12

State (Nct Of Delhi) vs Ahmed Jaan

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 695
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State (Nct Of Delhi)
Respondent
Ahmed Jaan
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dismissal of Criminal Revision Petition No. 356/2004 by the Delhi High Court, which was based on inordinate delay in filing and re-filing. The Court emphasized that the sufficiency of the cause for delay is crucial, not merely the length of the delay. It held that the High Court's summary dismissal without addressing the appellant's explanations was incorrect, but ultimately decided not to interfere with the High Court's order due to the significant time elapsed since the original discharge order under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 124A, and 120B IPC.

State (Nct Of Delhi) vs Ahmed Jaan · Niyam