Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-08-13

Arjun Mahto vs State Of Bihar

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 3270
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arjun Mahto
Respondent
State Of Bihar
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the alteration of conviction from Section 396 IPC to Section 395 IPC, emphasizing that the evidence did not support the charge of murder during dacoity. The Court held that the sentence of life imprisonment was excessive and modified it to seven years of rigorous imprisonment, aligning with the principles of proportionality in sentencing. The judgment clarified the distinction between the two sections, focusing on the necessity of proving murder for a conviction under Section 396 IPC.

Arjun Mahto vs State Of Bihar · Niyam