Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-04-29

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORTS)BOMBAY vs M/S. HICO ENTERPRISES

Citation / case number
SC 2006/2397
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORTS)BOMBAY
Respondent
M/S. HICO ENTERPRISES
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,P. SATHASIVAM,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) regarding the liability of the transferee of a Value Based Advance License (VABAL). The Court clarified that under Section 28(1) and Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962, the transferee cannot be compelled to prove fulfillment of export obligations by the original license holder. The appeal was dismissed as the show cause notice did not attribute any infraction to the transferee, affirming the Tribunal's conclusion that the original licensee holds the responsibility for compliance.

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORTS)BOMBAY vs M/S. HICO ENTERPRISES · Niyam