Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-04-03

M/S. CONSOLIDATED ENGG.ENTERPRISES vs PRINCIPAL SECY. IRRIGATION DEPTT. .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/8970
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. CONSOLIDATED ENGG.ENTERPRISES
Respondent
PRINCIPAL SECY. IRRIGATION DEPTT. .
Author
M. PANCHAL K.G. BALAKRISHNAN
Bench
J.M. PANCHAL CJI K.G. BALAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision to set aside the District Court's dismissal of the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was justified as the application was not time-barred. The Court clarified that the provisions of Sections 12 and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, apply to arbitration proceedings, allowing for the extension of limitation periods under certain circumstances. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings in accordance with law.

M/S. CONSOLIDATED ENGG.ENTERPRISES vs PRINCIPAL SECY. IRRIGATION DEPTT. . · Niyam