Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-04-21

POONAM KUMARI vs JAI PRAKASH PANDEY .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/10253
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
POONAM KUMARI
Respondent
JAI PRAKASH PANDEY .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the principles of natural justice require that a party must be given an opportunity to be heard before any adverse decision is made against them, as per Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Court found that the appellant was not given notice in the writ proceedings, which led to a violation of her rights. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order quashing the selection made by the Dealer Selection Board and directed that the appellant's case be reconsidered in light of her right to be heard.

POONAM KUMARI vs JAI PRAKASH PANDEY . · Niyam