DEPTT.,TRAINING & TECH. EDUCATION vs R.L. YADAV

The Supreme Court held that the appointment order of Sh. R.L. Yadav, which explicitly stated he would not be entitled to additional remuneration or a claim for regular appointment while officiating as Principal, was determinative. The Court distinguished this case from Selvaraj vs. Lt. Governor, where the order provided for salary entitlement. The Court set aside the High Court's and Tribunal's orders, ruling in favor of the appellant, thereby affirming the terms of the original appointment order under the principles of service law.