CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD. vs AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD.

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal concerning the vacation of an interim injunction related to the trademark 'ATOR' used by the appellant against the respondent's use of 'ATORIL'. The Court held that the appeal had become infructuous due to the respondent's change of product name and directed the trial court to expedite the resolution of the underlying suit within one year. The interim injunction was maintained until the suit's disposal, without adjudicating on the merits of the injunction application.