Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-04-01

STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH vs NEZONE LAW HOUSE, ASSAM

Citation / case number
SC 2001/8227
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Respondent
NEZONE LAW HOUSE, ASSAM
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
P.SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the principles of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation do not apply when the claim is based on a disputed document. The Court emphasized that the High Court erred in allowing the writ petition despite evidence of manipulation in the documents presented by the respondent. The appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's decision, thereby dismissing the writ petition filed by the respondent.

STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH vs NEZONE LAW HOUSE, ASSAM · Niyam