SUBRAY THIMMANNA HEGDE vs NAGARAJ THIMMANNA HEGDE .

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's framing of substantial questions of law in the Second Appeal did not comply with the requirements of Section 100 CPC. The Court found that the issues raised regarding the sale of ancestral property and the applicability of Sections 35 and 85 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, were not substantial questions as defined under the CPC. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the case for fresh consideration, directing the High Court to resolve the appeal within six months.