Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-04-21

OMA RAM vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/22133
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
OMA RAM
Respondent
STATE OF RAJASTHAN .
Author
ARIJTI PASAYAT
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan High Court's dismissal of writ petitions challenging the vires of certain provisions of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950, specifically Sections 54A and 69(6). The Court found that these provisions, which limit judicial review and confer powers on Excise Authorities, are within the legislative competence of the State under Article 254 of the Constitution and do not violate the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court held that the amendments are not ultra vires and affirmed the High Court's decision, thereby rejecting the appellants' claims.

OMA RAM vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN . · Niyam