Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-04-29

A. Satyanarayana Reddy And Ors vs The Presiding Officer, Labour ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2008 SC 94
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A. Satyanarayana Reddy And Ors
Respondent
The Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in relation to a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) implemented by the State of Andhra Pradesh. The Court held that employees who opted for VRS were not entitled to lay off compensation as their employment relationship had ceased, thus affirming the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The judgment clarified that the provisions of the VRS did not include lay off compensation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

A. Satyanarayana Reddy And Ors vs The Presiding Officer, Labour ... · Niyam