Management Of Aurofood Pvt. Ltd vs S.Rajulu

The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of the respondent from service was justified due to proven misconduct, including the use of abusive language and insubordination, as per the findings of the domestic enquiry. The Court emphasized that the High Court's interference with the quantum of punishment under Article 226 was unwarranted, given that the misconduct was serious and the enquiry was conducted properly. The appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's order for reinstatement with back wages.