Deptt., Training & Tech vs R.L. Yadav

The Supreme Court held that the appointment order of Sh. R.L. Yadav, which explicitly stated he would not be entitled to additional remuneration or a claim for regular appointment while officiating as Principal, was determinative. The Court distinguished this case from Ramakant Shripad Sinai Advalpalkar vs. Union of India and Selvaraj vs. Lt. Governor, emphasizing that the clear terms of the appointment precluded any entitlement to the Principal's pay scale. Consequently, the Court set aside the orders of the High Court and the Tribunal, allowing the appeal.