Kishor Kirtilal Mehta & Ors vs Vijay Kirtilal Mehta & Ors

The Supreme Court allowed an application for correction of errors in a judgment, noting that the counsel for the appellants had no objection to the corrections. The Court identified additional mistakes, including the duplication of paragraph 15 and the incorrect naming of the learned senior counsel for the State. The corrections were ordered to be made without hindering the appellants' application being heard by the Bombay High Court regarding document examination scheduled for April 16, 2008.